Why Are My Bonds Down When the Fed Hasn’t Moved?

Almost every homeowner in America understands the bond market better than they realize.

A bond is a loan you make. You hand your money to a company or a government; they agree to pay you a set rate of interest for a set number of years, and they promise to return your money at the end. That agreement is a contract—and like any contract, it has value. Most people never think about how the contract’s value changes long before it comes due.

Think about the homeowner who locked in a 3% mortgage a few years ago and now feels stuck because moving would mean giving it up. That loan is worth a fortune to them. But flip the transaction around and look at it from the other side of the table. Assume you’re the person who made that 3% mortgage loan. If you can issue new loans and get a 5% return, you’ll have to pay extra to someone to take that loan off your hands.

That is the entire bond market in one sentence.

When you own a bond paying 3% and newly issued bonds pay 5%, investors have little reason to pay full price for yours. To compete, your bond’s market value must fall. The bond has not defaulted or missed a payment; it is still doing exactly what it promised. Only the price someone is willing to pay for it today has changed.

The opposite is equally true. If you own a 5% bond in a world where new bonds pay 3%, then yours becomes more valuable. This seesaw has always been how bonds work. Most investors simply never had to think about it during the decade when rates went nowhere but down.

Educational illustration created by OpenAI

What the Federal Reserve Actually Controls

When people hear that the Fed “held rates steady,” they reasonably assume bond prices should have held steady too.

The Federal Reserve sets a target range for the federal funds rate. That is one rate: a short-term rate that banks charge each other overnight. It is enormously influential, but it does not determine what your bond fund is worth.

Long-term yields, by contrast, are set in the open market by investors weighing inflation expectations, economic growth, government borrowing (and the total supply of new Treasury debt), and their best guess about what the Fed does next. Now you see where shaky outcomes occur: bond rates and prices ride on investors’ best guesses. The Fed influences that conversation, but it does not control it.

This brings us to 2026. The Federal Reserve has now held its target range at 3.50% to 3.75% for five consecutive meetings, and at the most recent one, three members dissented because they wanted to raise rates. Meanwhile, inflation has stayed above the Fed’s 2% goal, the economy has kept expanding, and oil prices have been volatile due to Middle East tensions.

Investors who began this year expecting two rate cuts are now talking about a possible rate hike. That repricing pushed the 10-year Treasury above 4.7% and drove the 30-year past 5.3%, its highest level in nineteen years. Long-term yields rose without the Fed lifting a finger (remember our conversation above about investor sentiment affecting long-term yields?), and bond prices fell accordingly.

“Conservative” Does Not Mean “Never Declines”

Somewhere along the way, the word conservative came to mean guaranteed not to go down, but it never meant that.

A conservative portfolio is built to fluctuate less than an aggressive one. It is not built to eliminate volatility, and it never was. Every finance professional will tell you that bonds carry real risks: interest-rate risk, inflation risk, credit risk, and liquidity risk. Interest-rate risk is the one every bondholder has felt firsthand these past several months.

How far a bond’s price falls depends mostly on how long you have to wait to get your money back. A bond maturing in thirty years commits a buyer to below-market interest payments for three decades, so its price has to drop substantially to make up the difference. A bond maturing in two years commits them for only two, and at the end of those two years the issuer repays the full face amount regardless of what rates did in the meantime. That short wait is what limits the decline, and it is why the money you plan to spend soonest belongs in the bonds that move the least.

Higher Rates Are Not All Bad News

Here is the part that gets lost in the frustration: rising yields are a gift to a patient bond investor.

Every bond that matures inside your portfolio can get reinvested at today’s higher rates. Every new dollar you invest buys more income than it would have bought two years ago. That interest income does not erase a decline in market value overnight, but it can steadily rebuild it. It raises the income your portfolio produces going forward. Higher starting yields also provide a thicker cushion the next time rates move against us.

The same rate increase that hurts bond prices today is what improves bond returns tomorrow. But retirees capture only the second half of that trade if they still have money to invest when higher rates arrive.

Why We Use Conservative Projections

No investment climbs in a straight line. Stocks have bear markets. Bonds have years like this one. Real estate corrects. Cash quietly loses to inflation.

These difficult elements are why we choose not to build a retirement income plan on the assumption that every investment earns its historical average every year. When we construct a Perennial Income Model™, we assume future investment returns far below historical averages in every projection we run.

We are not trying to forecast the market. Nobody can. We are building a margin for error into a plan that has to survive thirty years of reality.

If a retirement plan only works when every investment cooperates, it is not much of a plan.

Every Investment Has a Job

At Peterson Wealth Advisors, we do not evaluate any investment in isolation. We evaluate it against the job it was hired to do.

Money that funds your grocery bill three years from now and money that will likely be spent by your grandchildren twenty years from now should never be measured by the same yardstick, held in the same investments, or worried about on the same timeline. Bonds in a retirement portfolio are there to produce income, provide stability, add diversification, and—most importantly—make certain you are never forced to sell stocks at a discount to pay next month’s bills.

So, the question worth asking is not, “Did my bonds go down?”

The question is, “Are my investments still positioned to deliver the income I need, when I need it?”

For our clients, the answer has not changed.

Interest rates will keep moving. Bond prices will keep adjusting. The Federal Reserve will keep making decisions we cannot predict in advance. Temporary market movements are unavoidable, but letting them derail a carefully constructed retirement plan is entirely avoidable.

The goal was never to avoid every disappointing quarter. The goal is dependable retirement income throughout the unpredictable future.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Why are my bonds losing value when the Fed hasn’t raised interest rates?

Bond prices can fall even when the Federal Reserve holds its short-term policy rate steady. Long-term bond yields are influenced by inflation expectations, economic growth, government borrowing, and investor expectations about future interest rates. When long-term yields rise, existing bonds with lower yields generally become less valuable in the market.

2. Why do bond prices fall when interest rates rise?

Bond prices and interest rates generally move in opposite directions. When new bonds are issued with higher yields, existing bonds with lower yields become less attractive to investors. Their market prices typically fall until their yields become competitive with newly issued bonds.

3. Does the Federal Reserve control bond prices?

No. The Federal Reserve directly controls the federal funds rate, a short-term interest rate. Bond prices, particularly for longer-term bonds, are determined by the broader bond market and can be affected by inflation expectations, economic conditions, government borrowing, and expectations for future Fed policy.

4. Can long-term bond yields rise even if the Fed doesn’t raise rates?

Yes. Long-term Treasury yields can rise independently of changes to the federal funds rate. Investors may demand higher yields because they expect higher inflation, stronger economic growth, greater government borrowing, or higher interest rates in the future.

5. Are bonds still safe if their prices go down?

A decline in a bond’s market price does not necessarily mean the bond has defaulted or that you will lose the full amount invested if you hold it to maturity. Assuming the issuer makes the required payments, an individual bond generally pays its stated interest and principal at maturity. However, bonds still carry risks, including interest-rate, inflation, credit, and liquidity risk.

6. Do higher interest rates eventually help bond investors?

Generally, yes. Higher yields mean that maturing bonds and new contributions can be reinvested at more attractive rates. Over time, those higher yields can increase the income generated by a bond portfolio and help offset the impact of earlier price declines.

7. Should retirees be worried when their bond portfolio goes down?

Not necessarily. A temporary decline in bond prices does not automatically mean a retirement plan is in trouble. The more important question is whether the portfolio is structured to provide the income and liquidity needed throughout retirement without forcing unnecessary sales of investments at unfavorable times.

8. Should I sell my bonds when interest rates rise?

Not necessarily. Selling bonds simply because their market value has declined can undermine the role they play in a diversified retirement portfolio. Whether you should change your bond allocation depends on your time horizon, income needs, risk tolerance, and overall retirement plan.

Could RECA Apply to You or Someone in Your Family?

Most retirees spend their lives trying to make wise financial decisions. They save, sacrifice, care for their families, and try to be good stewards over the resources they have been given.

But every now and then, a financial planning opportunity comes along that has very little to do with investment markets, interest rates, or tax brackets. Instead, it has to do with knowing what benefits may be available and making sure families do not overlook something that could meaningfully help them.

The Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, often called RECA, may be one of those situations.

RECA is a federal compensation program for certain individuals who developed specific cancers or serious illnesses after exposure connected to the United States nuclear weapons program.

RECA will not apply to everyone. However, for families with roots in Utah, Idaho, New Mexico, parts of Arizona and Nevada, uranium mining communities, or certain ZIP codes in Missouri, Tennessee, Alaska, and Kentucky, it may be worth a closer look.

The reason I am writing about this now is because RECA was recently reauthorized and expanded, and the new filing deadline listed by the Department of Justice is December 31, 2027.

That may sound like plenty of time, but gathering old records, medical documentation, employment history, and survivor paperwork can take longer than expected. That is why it is wise to use the next few months to find out whether you or a loved one may qualify.

Who Should Pay Attention? 

RECA may be worth investigating if you, your spouse, your parents, or your grandparents fall into one of these categories:

  • You or a loved one were diagnosed with one of the specific cancers or illnesses covered by RECA

AND one of the following applies to you:

  • You lived in Utah, Idaho, or New Mexico during the nuclear-testing years.
  • You lived in certain counties in Arizona or Nevada during those years.
  • You worked in uranium mining, uranium milling, core drilling, uranium ore transportation, or uranium mine or mill remediation.
  • You lived, worked, or attended school in certain ZIP codes in Missouri, Tennessee, Alaska, or Kentucky after January 1, 1949.

This does not mean you automatically qualify. The rules are specific. But if any of these categories sound familiar, it may be worth reviewing the details on the Department of Justice RECA website (https://www.justice.gov/civil/reca).

Three Main Categories 

There are three categories that may be especially relevant for many families.

First, there are Downwinders. These are individuals who developed certain cancers after presumed exposure to radiation released during atmospheric nuclear testing. The affected areas include Utah, Idaho, and New Mexico, along with certain counties in Arizona and Nevada. For qualifying Downwinders, RECA provides a one-time payment of $100,000. If the affected person has died, eligible survivors may be able to apply.

Second, there are Uranium Workers. This may include certain uranium miners, millers, core drillers, ore transporters, and remediation workers. The covered work period runs from January 1, 1942, through December 31, 1990, and includes work in several states, including Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Wyoming, South Dakota, Washington, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon, and Texas. For qualifying Uranium Workers, RECA also provides a one-time payment of $100,000. In some situations, uranium-worker families may also qualify for additional benefits through a separate federal program called EEOICPA.

Third, there is Manhattan Project waste exposure. This category applies to certain individuals who lived, worked, or attended school for at least two years after January 1, 1949, in specific ZIP codes in Missouri, Tennessee, Alaska, or Kentucky. The compensation rules are different for this category. If the qualifying claimant is living, the benefit may be the greater of $50,000 or documented unreimbursed out-of-pocket medical expenses related to the covered illness. If the claimant has died, a surviving spouse or surviving children may be eligible for a smaller survivor benefit.

Because the location, date, and medical requirements are detailed, I would encourage families to review the official Department of Justice RECA page before assuming they do or do not qualify.

What Should You Gather? 

If you think RECA might apply to you or your family, the first step is not to decide whether you have a perfect, obviously qualifying case. The first step is to start organizing the facts.

Begin with a few basic questions:

Where did the person live, work, or attend school? During what years? Was there any uranium-related work? Was the person diagnosed with one of the covered illnesses? If the affected person has passed away, who are the eligible survivors?

Helpful records may include birth certificates, marriage certificates, death certificates, school records, employment records, tax records, medical records, church or religious records, old letters, and other documents that help establish where someone lived or worked.

This is not glamorous financial planning work, but it is important. Sometimes the most valuable planning step is simply gathering the right records before they disappear.

How Could a RECA Award Fit into Your Financial Plan? 

A RECA award should be treated as a planning event, not merely as a windfall.

For some families, the money may help replenish emergency reserves. For others, it may help support a surviving spouse, pay down debt, make home modifications, or provide additional security during retirement.

For survivor claims, the planning may also involve estate organization. Who is eligible? Are all surviving children known and documented? Are there family members who need to coordinate before a claim is filed?

And as with any meaningful financial event, it is wise to coordinate with the right professionals. An attorney or experienced claims specialist could be helpful when records are incomplete or the claim is complex. A CPA can help evaluate any tax questions. A financial planner can help determine how the funds fit into the retirement income plan, long-term tax plan, and estate plan.

Final Thoughts 

RECA will not apply to most families. But for families it does affect, it may be very meaningful.

If any of the places, dates, jobs, or diagnoses in this article sound familiar, do not simply dismiss it because the exposure happened decades ago. That is exactly why this program exists.

At Peterson Wealth Advisors, we do not determine legal eligibility for RECA claims. But we do believe good financial planning includes helping families identify opportunities, organizing important records and making strategic decisions when unexpected planning events arise.

If this article inspired you to think of your own family history, it may be worth reviewing the official Department of Justice RECA website and investigating before the current filing window closes.